(soorry in advance for the typos – I just had to get this out. If I had waited any longer, it wouldn’t have been published, so please bear with me.)
With the opening of the Rafah crossing between Gaza and Egypt the Arab Spring is in full-bloom!
Yet some are none to pleased about this turn of events.
But, please . . . please do not give in and believe easily all of the spin and negative rhetoric that is being pushed by the other side right now. Yes, you know who I mean by “the other” side. I try to remain somewhat neutral when I can, but the situation in Gaza is one of the biggest injustices of the past decade. Plain and simple. Below is a list of some of the spin I am picking up in the media over the past week or so re. Palestine along with my version of the “truth.” Of course these statements of truth reflect my own personal bias. However, I fully admit to it. Unlike some…..
Spin: Hamas siezed Gaza in 2007. Truth: Hamas was elected in democratic elections which had been strongly advocated for by both Israel and the USA. Anyone with an ounce of understanding about Palestine could have seen that one coming. The ruling Fatah party did, and strongly cautioned that Palestine was not ready for elections. American politicians either didn’t believe it or didn’t care and pushed hard for elections. Once Hamas was elected (due to strong public works initiatives, anti-Fatah corruption stance, and strong rhetoric against Israel) the US cut off diplomatic ties. IMO, this was one of the biggest foreign policy debacles of the past decade. Was Hamas being elected the best possible outcome from the elections? Absolutely not. Were the elections possibly rigged? I seriously doubt it. Should the US taken this as a serious wake-up call and need for a change in directions in Middle East foreign policy? Yes. The first thing they should have done was appoint Jimmy Carter as Ambassador (or Special Envoy) to Palestine and kept the channels of communication wide open.
Spin: An open border with Egypt will allow guns and Iranian weapons experts into Gaza. Truth: Both are most likely already there. The result of a completely blockaded border around Gaza (read: open-air prison) has been the development of a system of tunnels under the Gaza-Egypt border and “illegal” trade in everything from cement to cigarettes, guns to chewing gum. And probably a few Iranian weapons experts made it in too. Israel and the old Mubarak regime in Egypt were constantly griping about the tunnels and trying to shut them down – but the fact of the matter was they were Gaza’s lifelines in a very desperate time. Ask yourself what you would do as a normal law-abiding citizen if your town was completely blockaded by sovereign power. Would you politely request your duly elected government to stop their misguided approach to international politics in hopes that someday a shipment of flour might make it to your local supermarket – or would you line up at the end of the tunnel where all of the “illegal” flour was coming into the country? Now that the border with Egypt is open, everyday commodities needed for health and life will flow through the open borders and the tunnels will only be used for truly illegal things. Now the Palestinian authorities can join with Egyptians in shutting down the tunnels. As for the Iranian weapons experts – don’t get too worked up. If they have been helping up to this point they haven’t been that good. Palestinian military tech is woefully inaccurate. Also Iran has co-opted the Palestinian cause and ultimately Palestinians have no natural affinity for Iran. Which brings me to . . .
Spin: The open border with Egypt will increase Iranian support of Palestine. Truth: American foreign policy already pushed Palestine towards Iranian support. It’s about time somebody else starts speaking up for the underdog. This is simple playground rules. When someone is being bullied they look for help. When they are getting beat up real bad on a regular basis, they will look for help from anyone bigger and stronger than they are. They will especially look for help from someone who is enemies with the one that is beating them up in the first place. Even if the one being picked on isn’t really friends with those people. When your back is against the wall and your being threatened sometimes you throw in with some unsavory types. Especially when all the cool kids are just hanging around watching and not wanting to get their knuckles dirty. Or if it’s the cool kids’ friend that is doing the bullying. With America refusing diplomatic relations with the duly elected government of Palestine, US foreign policy pushed Palestine into the arms of Iran making the situation much worse than it ever was before. Will Iran have freer access to Gaza now. Perhaps. But to what end? The truly cool kids on the playground are the ones who stand up for the underdogs even when it is their own BFF that is beating them up.
Spin: Obama was out of line and endangering our relations with Israel, not to mention Israel’s security by suggesting a return to 1967 borders. Truth: George W. Bush said the same thing a few years ago. If you don’t believe it – check out this letter from W. to Ariel Sharon. Bush used a term that probably makes more sense – “the 1949 armistice lines” but in effect both he and Obama said the same thing. Bush even advocated for a two-state solution in his letter. So what is all the fuss about? What are Republicans griping about? American politicians need to stop posturing over Israel-Palestine and stop cowering in fear of AIPAC lobbying money being pulled out from underneath them and actually stand up for what’s right and just in the region. Besides Obama was clear in his speech that the ’67 (or ’49) borders were the basis for final border negotiations with the idea of mutually agreed upon land swaps. This has been part of every American backed plan for peace in the Middle East for the past several years. Why is Obama taking heat for it. Obama went on to speak very strongly against any Palestinian backing of terrorist operations or denying Israel’s right to exist.
Spin: Per Benjamin Netanyahu they 1967 (1949) borders are indefensible. Truth: It is decades of illegal Israeli settlement activity that have made that border indefensible. Anyone who has spent any time in the West Bank know that it has not been a contiguous Palestinian territory for a very long time. It is riddled with Israeli settlements like a hunk of Swiss cheese and sliced up by Israeli roads that Palestinians are forbidden to drive on or build near. The long-standing policy of Israeli’s constructing settlements and roads on Palestinian land has disrupted the natural growth and development of Palestinian society. It has also acted as an Israeli insurance policy to be cashed in on the day final status negotiations begin in earnest. With all of the territory and population represented by Israeli settlements in the West Bank, surely Israel would have the right to protect those interests. They couldn’t ask those citizens to leave their homes and property could they? (Kindly note the dripping sarcasm). The 4th Geneva convention clearly states that it is illegal for an occupying power to transfer citizens to settlements within the militarily occupied country. It would be like Americans setting up American-only cities in Afghanistan or Iraq. Crazy. It would never happen. Yet we’ve let Israel do it for over 40 years. And now Israel is crying, “How will we protect our citizens if we go back to the 1967 borders?” Well, maybe you shouldn’t have continued to steal Palestinian land to build your illegal settlements? For those who think I am being to harsh I saw it with my own eyes back in the 90s. A Palestinian farmer whose family had owned land since Ottoman times, routinely had land stolen by settlers. They would come out at night with automatic weapons and extend their fence 10 more meters into his property. The year we visited him they also burnt his wheat harvest. Which brings me to the last spin . . .
Spin: Palestinians are not true partners for peace. Truth: Neither are the Israelis. Anyone who honestly looks at the 100+ years of history (I’m going back to the beginning of the “modern” zionist movements) cannot see either side as being 100% committed to lasting peace. Both sides have committed great atrocities. Both sides have advocated and politicked mostly for themselves. Both sides have sought the upper hand. But, honestly . . . Israel has had the upper hand for quite some time. They have been almost completely in control of the territory since 1967. They have continually tightened the noose around Palestine’s neck. The discomfort this caused led to two intifadas, but, really – if the Palestinians had enough resources, don’t you think there would have been an outright war by now?
So, yes the Arab Spring is in full bloom … but I fear a scorching Middle Eastern summer is due to hit anytime soon and all the flowers that have sprung up around the region will soon wither and die.
The problem is both Israeli and Arab cultures highly value honor, despise shame, and espouse revenge. Both are eye for and eye and tooth for a tooth cultures. Many eyes have been blackened, many teeth knocked out, much blood spilled by both sides. The need for revenge does not die easily in the Middle East (on either side). It festers for years and years. Politicians will continue to say what they want. Pundits will spin these speeches. People will take sides on Facebook. And people (both Israeli and Palestinian) who we don’t know, will never meet, and honestly probably don’t really care about will continue to suffer and die until both sides have the courage to lay down all of their perceived rights and follow the advice of an old Middle Eastern prophet, “You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighborand hate your enemy.’ But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you . . .”
Filed under: Egypt, Gaza, human rights, peace | Tagged: diplomacy, Egypt, Gaza, human rights, israel, Midde East, Middle East, Middle East diplomacy, Middle East Peace Process, Middle East politics, Netanyahu, Obama, palestine, peace, Peace Process, Political Spin, Politics | 4 Comments »